No products in the cart.
Puerh Junky Harassment!
23
May
Seems Puerh Junky Harassment is omnipresent these days. Your Puerh Junkyness can’t go anywhere without being hectored by the rabble about my tinning developments. “Yo PJ! What’s up with the ’06 Fohai you still haven’t posted?” shouts the bedraggled woman with the big nose and colourful shawl covering her greying hair. “PJ, hey PJ! Are you ignoring my texts? What the word with the Lucky 7542, DQZ you’ve had in clay well nigh two months already? Why you ghosting me?” read the email from someone in some place called “Topeka.” Some dude with his eyebrows tattooed, one reading “Puerh” and the other “Junky,” in a pink Dodgers baseball cap in a big red Dodge Ram rolls down his window at a stop light asking, “Hey man, you still got the Water Blue Mark in porcelain?” How did he know that?!!
I tell ya, it’s getting hectic out there, a real cramp to my Puerh Junky anonymity.
As luck would have it, there is word on a few productions that I can share. Speaking of luck, lets start with the aforementioned Lucky 7542, DQZ, which has been in zisha since late Feb/early Mar 2021. If you’ve had occasion to gander this production, you’ll know that there are two storage options avail, wet and proper. Yes. If it’s called wet, the storage is the opposite of proper, so the objective of claying it was to do something about the detestable dank oppression. Findings are highly favourable.
There’s zero dank in the first five infusions. There’s a nice balance, thickness, and sweetness that didn’t previously exist because the garbage taste was too loud. It’s about half way seasoned presently, part of the age and nature of 7542 also factoring. It was set aside for the next day, which produced even more sweetness and pleasantness for an additional 6-8 infusions. Clay seems to be the very best way to season wet-stored puerhs where they can actually become drinkable. At six weeks storage give or take, the effects are quite pleasing, sufficient to make it a top-shelf offering for puerh drinkers with fairly high standards.
Since we’re on the topic of clay, it’s worth noting that the ’01 Yiwu Huangpian has received similar treatment but for different reasons. If I were to guess, it was subjected to a period of heavy wet storage and then a very long period of dry storage. Upon taste, the Yiwu Huangpian receives high marks for storage and taste but some finishing touches never hurt. Claying in this case provides volume that takes a good production to the next level.
Oh yeah, the Fohai, 6FTM. It’s coming along in the tin. The first couple weeks it was bright, ebullient even in the vein of the Fu or the Bulang Business, which I delisted, as somehow I’m only down to one left. Anyway, about two weeks I checked in on the Fohai, which is the old name for Menghai, and it’s changed dramatically. There’s much more petrol, the taste is much more serious in a scotch kinda way, even though I hate scotch and find the petrol vibe far more interesting. Findings for the Pig, 6FTM have been similarly positive.
I’ve been letting those productions just have their way in the tins. I’m not taking pains to manage air exposure, for example. I am wondering how such measures will influence their root beer potential. The ’04 Monkey, for example, is in full root beer glory. It’s never been broken up and all dalliances with it have only involved moving it from one ring of the storage circus to the other– and out from the cursed cardboard, sometime relatively late in the game. The Monkey has hardcore compression, as do all the 6FTM offerings up til 2010. The ’11 Rabbit is shockingly agey, with a petrol expression that emerges much later in its tightly pressed predecessors.
I’ve referenced a few unlisted items here. Just touch base if you’re interested in any samples.